<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving back the goal post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/moving-back-the-goal-post/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/moving-back-the-goal-post</link>
	<description>Engaging the culture by challenging the status quo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane</title>
		<link>http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/moving-back-the-goal-post/comment-page-1#comment-5779</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackinformant.com/2008/01/30/moving-back-the-goal-post/#comment-5779</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, his point is valid on both fronts. Regardless of the actions of the Democratic party on the state level, votes may not be counted towards the preferred candidate. This may be a different situation, but the issue is still the same.



Bottom line, Democrats chose Clinton in that state so those delegates should go to her if they decide to count them at the election. But it those delegates are a make or break it for Obama and they still go to Clinton, there will be hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, his point is valid on both fronts. Regardless of the actions of the Democratic party on the state level, votes may not be counted towards the preferred candidate. This may be a different situation, but the issue is still the same.</p>
<p>Bottom line, Democrats chose Clinton in that state so those delegates should go to her if they decide to count them at the election. But it those delegates are a make or break it for Obama and they still go to Clinton, there will be hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar</title>
		<link>http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/moving-back-the-goal-post/comment-page-1#comment-5778</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackinformant.com/2008/01/30/moving-back-the-goal-post/#comment-5778</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s actually weak for a very good reason: parties control their primary process. The local parties broke the wishes of the national party so they punished the local party.



If the delegates wind up counting at the end, then Cobb&#039;s point is valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s actually weak for a very good reason: parties control their primary process. The local parties broke the wishes of the national party so they punished the local party.</p>
<p>If the delegates wind up counting at the end, then Cobb&#8217;s point is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

