Comments on: Friday brain dump for week of 7/22/05 http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205 Engaging the culture by challenging the status quo Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Keith http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/comment-page-1#comment-1066 Keith Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:13:52 +0000 http://blackinformant.com/2005/07/22/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/#comment-1066 You are pro-abortion, you support murder. Simple fact. In fact, you support the fact that no group of persons are murdered by abortion at a higher rate in America than are African American babies. You support the fact that Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers set-up shop in more often in lower income areas than any other areas in the United States. You support murder. I have not called your morals into question, you have made clear some of your morals and I simply have pointed back to them. As far as third-trimester abortions while obviously they are in the minority, there are plenty of them and they charge plenty of money to make a mother and father the mother and father of a dead child. You fool yourself. Okay, perhaps I should not have said you 'need, to worry. But you should worry, you should be concerned about the murder of children in the womb. A society that can put to death the most innocent of persons, the most helpless of persons then has the ability to murder anyone for any reason. I don't want to fill Duanes comment section with a heated conversation. So regardless of if you make comment back or not, I'll hush my mouth for now. You are pro-abortion, you support murder.

Simple fact.

In fact, you support the fact that no group of persons are murdered by abortion at a higher rate in America than are African American babies.

You support the fact that Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers set-up shop in more often in lower income areas than any other areas in the United States.

You support murder.

I have not called your morals into question, you have made clear some of your morals and I simply have pointed back to them.

As far as third-trimester abortions while obviously they are in the minority, there are plenty of them and they charge plenty of money to make a mother and father the mother and father of a dead child.

You fool yourself.

Okay, perhaps I should not have said you ‘need, to worry.

But you should worry, you should be concerned about the murder of children in the womb.

A society that can put to death the most innocent of persons, the most helpless of persons then has the ability to murder anyone for any reason.

I don’t want to fill Duanes comment section with a heated conversation.

So regardless of if you make comment back or not, I’ll hush my mouth for now.

]]> By: rhythm http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/comment-page-1#comment-1065 rhythm Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:54:51 +0000 http://blackinformant.com/2005/07/22/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/#comment-1065 okay, this is simply to clarify the facts--not to address keith's idea that i support "murder"--especially considering the fact that i've never stated on this blog or anywhere else how i personally feel about abortion. so, anyway, since all states currently have control over the issues i noted in my first comment, if roe were overturned they would STILL have this control. this is not "hysteria"--this is fact. i'm not implying that all 50 states (or even a majority of them) would suddenly decide to limit abortion to cases where life or health depends on the procedure--i'm simply stating the FACT that any number of them would have the AUTHORITY to do so if they so choose. also, there are very few providers nationwide where third trimester abortions are performed, so your idea that abortion will remain legal in almost every state "up to the day of birth" is ridiculous. and i think it's a shame that you refuse to participate in these conversations without attempting to call my morals into question and telling me what i NEED to worry about. tell me, has that ever worked with a black woman? okay, this is simply to clarify the facts–not to address keith’s idea that i support “murder”–especially considering the fact that i’ve never stated on this blog or anywhere else how i personally feel about abortion. so, anyway, since all states currently have control over the issues i noted in my first comment, if roe were overturned they would STILL have this control. this is not “hysteria”–this is fact. i’m not implying that all 50 states (or even a majority of them) would suddenly decide to limit abortion to cases where life or health depends on the procedure–i’m simply stating the FACT that any number of them would have the AUTHORITY to do so if they so choose. also, there are very few providers nationwide where third trimester abortions are performed, so your idea that abortion will remain legal in almost every state “up to the day of birth” is ridiculous. and i think it’s a shame that you refuse to participate in these conversations without attempting to call my morals into question and telling me what i NEED to worry about. tell me, has that ever worked with a black woman?

]]> By: Keith http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/comment-page-1#comment-1064 Keith Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:00:27 +0000 http://blackinformant.com/2005/07/22/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/#comment-1064 Rhythm, you are simply mistaken. While you ask Duane not to over-simplify I ask you not to take part in pro-abortion hysteria. Very few of the 23 states which had legal abortion before Roe-V-Wade limited abortion to 'only if the mothers health or life are at risk'. This nation has only become more accepting of abortion since Roe-V-Wade, it is highly unlikely that if Roe-V-Wade were over turned that any state legalized abortion would limit abortion to such an extent. You need not worry, with or with out Roe-V-Wade abortion in America will always be here and will remain legal and will in almost every state (if Roe-V-Wade is overturned) be legal up to the day of birth. Again you needn't worry about the future of abortion. What you need to worry about is the fact that you support the murder of innocent children, Rhythm,

you are simply mistaken.

While you ask Duane not to over-simplify I ask you not to take part in pro-abortion hysteria.

Very few of the 23 states which had legal abortion before Roe-V-Wade limited abortion to ‘only if the mothers health or life are at risk’.

This nation has only become more accepting of abortion since Roe-V-Wade, it is highly unlikely that if Roe-V-Wade were over turned that any state legalized abortion would limit abortion to such an extent.

You need not worry, with or with out Roe-V-Wade abortion in America will always be here and will remain legal and will in almost every state (if Roe-V-Wade is overturned) be legal up to the day of birth.

Again you needn’t worry about the future of abortion.

What you need to worry about is the fact that you support the murder of innocent children,

]]> By: Duane http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/comment-page-1#comment-1063 Duane Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:52:02 +0000 http://blackinformant.com/2005/07/22/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/#comment-1063 Rhythm, No over-simplification here :) <b>That would be up to the people.</b> For the most part, the state can only do what the people demand. If the <strong>people </strong>demand the right for a woman to have an abortion, then that is what the <strong>people </strong>will get. Just slow your roll a little bit on this one. What's wrong with letting the people decide? Remember, America is still a democracy! Rhythm,

No over-simplification here :)

That would be up to the people. For the most part, the state can only do what the people demand. If the people demand the right for a woman to have an abortion, then that is what the people will get.

Just slow your roll a little bit on this one. What’s wrong with letting the people decide? Remember, America is still a democracy!

]]> By: rhythm http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/comment-page-1#comment-1062 rhythm Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:27:29 +0000 http://blackinformant.com/2005/07/22/friday-brain-dump-for-week-of-72205/#comment-1062 if roe v. wade is overturned, then yes, the legality of abortion would be decided by the states. however, the thought that most states would make it leagal doesn't mean there would not be a lot of back alley abortions. the states would still be allowed to (as they were pre-roe) place stipulations on access, waiting periods, parental consent or notification, viability, and the circumstances under which abortion is allowed: i.e. only if a woman's health and/or life are in danger... let's not oversimplify. if roe v. wade is overturned, then yes, the legality of abortion would be decided by the states. however, the thought that most states would make it leagal doesn’t mean there would not be a lot of back alley abortions. the states would still be allowed to (as they were pre-roe) place stipulations on access, waiting periods, parental consent or notification, viability, and the circumstances under which abortion is allowed: i.e. only if a woman’s health and/or life are in danger… let’s not oversimplify.

]]>