This morning, a comment was received by a Lea Winfrey Young (wife of artist Gilbert Young–artist who is at odds with the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Foundation for not choosing him or any other Black artist) in response the the post I did on the King Memorial controversy entitled “Here’s a solution”. She writes the following:

“If you’re going to blog about a topic, at least have your facts straight. (OK, I was tempted to finish that sentence with CLOWN…but didn’t). These are the facts. There was a competition for the original design for the memorial site. That took place in 2000. There were more than 900 entries–each paying $75 for the honor of designing a monument to our beloved Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The Roma group, a white design firm based in California, won the “blind” competition. They were “assisted” with their entry by the head of the King Research Institute, Clayborne Carson. No other entrant was favored with Carson’s input. Once our King Is Ours protest began, and we made that bit of info public, Roma quietly bowed out (didn’t read about that did ‘ya). They were replaced by a black, female run firm from DC. Things have to “look” right, RIGHT? The announcement that Yixin would sculpt King was announced in February. For your information, Yixin is famous for being a government sponsored artist in the People’s Republic of China most widely known for his many, many, (14 at last count) sculptures of the murderer Mao Tse Tung. The granite will come from China, quarried using slave labor–that means underaged workers who are not properly protected from the silica dust–which kills. FYI: American granite unions have just joined what you call our “childish debate”. Apparently, $10 million in federal funds was allocated to the monument, and no U.S. company was allowed to bid on the granite contract. The unions are angry, and so are a few State Rep’s and Senators. Ann Lau is a human rights activist, and a member of our team. She has brought Dr. Harry Wu on board. If you don’t know who he is…read a book. Now, to Yixin. He was “recommended.” There was no competition. What you don’t know is that Ed Dwight, America’s first black astronaut, and creator of more than 90 national monuments, was the artist contracted to be named artist-of-record for the King monument. Yixin was brought in as a subcontractor to take Dwight’s small clay model and make it into a 28 foot sculpture. When Yixin presented his model, Dwight wrote a 13 page critique of his work. Apparently, the deal was done to acquire the Chinese granite, and Dwight was making big waves. He was kicked to the curb, and Yixin was quietly moved into position as artist-of-record. So let’s see, you’ve got an artist who knows nothing about King or the Civil Rights movement, who is known for his sculptures of a mass murderer. You’ve got stone for a monument to Dr. King being quarried using slave labor. And you’ve got an illegal transaction involving millions in federal funds. From what I read in your blog, that’s OK with you… You want to quote Dr. King? Here’s one for you: “Where do we go from here? First, we must massively assert our dignity and worth. We must stand up amidst a system that still oppresses us and develop an unassailable and majestic sense of value. We must no longer be ashamed of being black. The job of arousing manhood within a people that have been taught for so many centuries that they are nobody is not easy.” MLK in his last address as president to the SCLC.

You “bold faced” the sentence about the King Foundation committee members choosing Lei, and you’re right, they DID agreed to the choice of Yixin. But the King Foundation’s PR firm used an eraser on the words “to serve as subcontractor.” If you’re going to spread the word, my brother, make sure you get it right.”

Dear Lea,

As a commentator on things such as culture and politics, it is an unfortunate part of the role to at times to get the issue wrong. Bloggers like myself will oftentimes formulate our opinions largely on what is communicated in the media. However as individuals it is up to us to practice some form of responsibility when we get the story wrong. If that is the case here, then I do apologize for that.

In an effort to “right” any wrongs you feel were communicated in this post, I decided to do some additional research on the topic. Several questions kept popping up in my mind when I compared your statement to the statements made by those who are also part of this protest.

#1 – FYI: American granite unions have just joined what you call our “childish debate”

I just did a search of a website I am quite sure you know about–kingisours.com and was unable to find any reference to a granite union joining your complaint. In many cases, this would be treated as a major announcement that is showcased somewhere on an organization’s (like yours) website. I even went as far as to thumb through 1,159 e-signatures on your petition and still found no reference to any American granite union. Please name the organization.

#2 – “…and no U.S. company was allowed to bid on the granite contract.”

Are you privy to any information from the King Monument Foundation that states that no U.S company is allowed to bid? Or are you basing this statement on a rejected bid placed by either you or someone you know? What I would like to see from you is a list of EVERY U.S. company who was not permitted beyond the initial application process.

#3. “Apparently, the deal was done to acquire the Chinese granite, and Dwight was making big waves.”

Do you have any evidence that the deal to acquire Chinese granite came with the selection of Yixin?

#4. “And you’ve got an illegal transaction involving millions in federal funds.”

What illegal transaction? Based on what you have presented here so far, nothing was done illegal. Shady? Yes. Illegal? I need to see more evidence.

#5. Since other US companies were also not allowed to compete as you suggested, they must share your same sentiments. Were you able to contact EVERY competitor and did they also sign your petition (regardless of color of the artist).?

#6. During my online search on this issue, I came across the following article. I will highlight the portion that caught my attention:

(capitolhillblue.com) “What has Howard and Atlanta artist Gilbert Young dismayed is that the committee even considered going outside the black community to make its selection for the artistic elements of the first monument dedicated to a black man on the Mall. Young says the project, which has raised $87 million of a planned $100 million, has been hijacked by corporate interests.

“It’s a smack in our face … It insults our community. It insults our craftsmanship,” said Young, 65, who has created the Web site KingIsOurs.com in protest. “You mean to tell me we couldn’t find a stone in America that was good enough? You mean to tell me we couldn’t find a black artist who was good enough?” (source)

If you have proof that federal funds were being used illegally and have the evidence to support it, why not press this issue in the courts? With that type of evidence, you would not be reduced to scanning the Internet and commenting on every article written on this subject.

Something else worth mentioning here–why name the website kingisOURS.com if this situation, according to you is solely about the “illegal” misdeeds of this organization? Why would your husband in the article excerpted above make the statement “You mean to tell me we couldn’t find a stone in America that was good enough? You mean to tell me we couldn’t find a black artist who was good enough?” Why make this into a race matter when you could get more millage making it into a legal matter?

Lastly, believe it or not I, too share your sentiments that it would be nice to have a Black American serve as the main architect for this project. I also do not like having China being mixed up in this issue for the same reasons that you pointed out. But unfortunately your comment still left for me many holes that cannot be simply covered by racial allegiance. There are many more unanswered questions that need to be addressed by both you and the King memorial committee.

I anxiously await your responses to these questions.

P.S. You do not win allies by name calling. You win them by making a strong case that can hold up to close scrutiny.
 

Sphere: Related Content