ZZ19E77E44 Cynthia Tucker: You are out of your mind  COMPLETELY!!Bush policies likely to blame for more teen births

First, violent crime. Now, teen birth rates.

After declining for more than a decade, births to unmarried teenagers suddenly increased 3 percent among 15- to 19-year-old girls between 2005 and 2006, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. Like the uptick in violent crime, this could signal a worrisome trend — another sign that undesirable social phenomena the nation struggled to curb in the 1990s have begun to ooze back up through the sewer grate. The one-year increase in births to teen moms could be an anomaly. Maybe the numbers for 2007 will show another decline, as adolescent girls stick to their abstinence pledges or remember to use contraceptives. Maybe the 3 percent increase is just a slight bump in the long road toward ending adolescent motherhood.

But the figures are troubling because they come after years of national folly, including a White House strategy of endorsing and funding abstinence-only education. President Bush and other social conservatives have long rejected giving adolescents information about contraception while also encouraging abstinence. They insist that teaching kids to rely on chastity will prevent sexual experimentation. (more…)

==========

Liberals like Tucker are in a complete tizzy right now because despite all of their support for abortion clinics family planning centers, free condom distributions, sex education programs in public schools, the idiot masses still have not been adhering to their sound wisdom. So once again they blame Bush.

While Tucker blasts abstinence-only programs in her piece, what she omits is the fact that abortion clinics are still accessible, sex education that is not abstinence-based is still taught in schools, and free condoms are still readily available in most urban and rural areas all across the United States. The real question she needs to ask herself here is “Why are folks opting not to use these readily-available services?”

Blaming personal life choices on White House policy is just silly. Should we blame the crack cocaine epidemic that spread during the 1990′s on then-President Bill Clinton? Certainly not.

Tucker should be smart enough to realize that no matter what “Act” or policy is pushed by the White House, it all comes down to the personal choices individuals make for themselves. For an ideology that prides itself in the preservation of “choice”, it seems that they would not be so angry about the choices these young individuals are making for themselves.

Family structure, not beltway bureaucrats is what has the ultimate control over this trend.




 

Sphere: Related Content