The Black Informant | African American Commentary, News and Community Building

Oh gracious….

I have previously asked what it is that the value of the sterling is based on and why GB did not just use Euros rather, but never quite got the answer. At least the US has a continent for a country and a third of the worlds fresh water supply. At least down here we have some coal, gold, platinum, Nelson Mandela and of course, white people – there is some basis to the ZAR, albeit undervalued.

George Soros… The big bad boogey man to the right. LOL… He should just change his name to Candyman.

When one man pretty much controls the purse strings of one party, you Democrats can call him whatever you like. Here are a couple nominations from me:

“Mr. White Chocolate 527 Flava”
or “527 Slim”

He has spent no more money nor has any more power than similar conservatives in his position. You sound no better than the cooks on the left who come up with all kinds of conspiracy theories for the rich deep pocket, “big daddy fat sacks” on the right (and there are plenty of them). It’s just funny to me that he doesn’t even have to say a word but gets thrown into yet another conspiracy theory.

…than similar conservatives in his position

Like whom?

99th richest man in the world.
Broke the Bank on England

It’s just funny to me that he doesn’t even have to say a word

His money does all the talking for him. The same goes for any other billionaire out there. Cameras are meant to be controlled, not to make public statements.

Like whom?

Richard Scaife, Rupert Murdoch, Coors Family, etc… These are also billionaires on the same level as Soro’s. And they have been accused of the same types of activities as Soros including trying to take down a sitting president. You want to talk about controlling cameras?? These people ACTUALLY do control them along with hundreds of newspapers and radio stations all over the world…

For starters–

Murdoch also gives to the Democratic party. None of the others you mentioned are either as rich or have used 527s to influence and finance one party as much as Soros. A few years ago, he came up with what he called the “shadow party” which was a conglomeration of leftest groups that either he controlled or has close ties. He called it the “shadow party”, not me.

Both parties have their financiers in the background who have their own agendas. But Soros (if you were to take the time to look at what this man ultimately wants and who he is using to get it) has by far more than anybody in that world has cloaked some of his own actions in a cloud of loosely tangled 527 groups and bundlers. You want to play that down? Enjoy.

You do realize Scaife and Soros are equivalent? Scaife is Soros pre 527s.

Actually, Scaife is more successful in influencing parties than is Soros.

Unless something has changed recently:

Soros is #97 on Forbes
Scaife is #843

That’s not equivalent. And again, if you compare the two parties in the last 4 years, Soros has way more influence on the Democratic party than Scaife has on Republicans. Does this make one better than the other? No.